Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://192.168.1.35:80/jspui/handle/10026.1/4308
Title: Facilitated physical activity as a treatment for depressed adults: randomised controlled trial.
Authors: Chalder, M;Wiles, NJ;Campbell, J;Hollinghurst, SP;Haase, AM;Taylor, AH;Fox, KR;Costelloe, C;Searle, A;Baxter, H;Winder, R;Wright, C;Turner, KM;Calnan, M;Lawlor, DA;Peters, TJ;Sharp, DJ;Montgomery, AA;Lewis, G
subject: Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antidepressive Agents
Depression
England
Exercise Therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Health Care
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Regression Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Year: 11-Feb-2016
Publisher: England
Description: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of facilitated physical activity as an adjunctive treatment for adults with depression presenting in primary care. DESIGN: Pragmatic, multicentre, two arm parallel randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practices in Bristol and Exeter. PARTICIPANTS: 361 adults aged 18-69 who had recently consulted their general practitioner with symptoms of depression. All those randomised had a diagnosis of an episode of depression as assessed by the clinical interview schedule-revised and a Beck depression inventory score of 14 or more. INTERVENTIONS: In addition to usual care, intervention participants were offered up to three face to face sessions and 10 telephone calls with a trained physical activity facilitator over eight months. The intervention was based on theory and aimed to provide individually tailored support and encouragement to engage in physical activity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self reported symptoms of depression, assessed with the Beck depression inventory at four months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes included use of antidepressants and physical activity at the four, eight, and 12 month follow-up points, and symptoms of depression at eight and 12 month follow-up. RESULTS: There was no evidence that participants offered the physical activity intervention reported improvement in mood by the four month follow-up point compared with those in the usual care group; adjusted between group difference in mean Beck depression inventory score -0.54 (95% confidence interval -3.06 to 1.99; P=0.68). Similarly, there was no evidence that the intervention group reported a change in mood by the eight and 12 month follow-up points. Nor was there evidence that the intervention reduced antidepressant use compared with usual care (adjusted odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 2.06; P=0.44) over the duration of the trial. However, participants allocated to the intervention group reported more physical activity during the follow-up period than those allocated to the usual care group (adjusted odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 3.89; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a facilitated physical activity intervention to usual care did not improve depression outcome or reduce use of antidepressants compared with usual care alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16900744.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/4308
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/4308
Standard no: 10.1136/bmj.e2758
1756-1833
Type Of Material: Article
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry

Files in This Item:
Click on the URI links for accessing contents.


Items in HannanDL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.