Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://192.168.1.35:80/jspui/handle/1893/12716
Title: Clarifying and Expressing Values
Authors: Volk, R;Llewellyn-Thomas, H;Queen's University, Ontario;Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA;Leiden University Medical Center;Cornell University;Leiden University Medical Center;The Ohio State University;Fagerlin, Angela;Pignone, Michael;Abhyankar, Purva;Col, Nananda;Feldman-Stewart, Deb;Gavaruzzi, Teresa;Kryworuchko, Jennifer;Levin, Carrie A;Pieterse, Arwen;Reyna, Valerie;Stiggelbout, Anne;Scherer, Laura;Wills, Celia;Witteman, Holly
subject: decision aids
standards
Year: 20-Jan-2018
2012
Publisher: IPDAS Collaboration
place: University of Michigan;University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill;University of New England;University of Padua;University of Saskatchewan;University of Michigan;University of Michigan
Description: First paragraph: Our evidence review found that existing VCMs were used for a variety of different decisions, rarely referenced underlying theory for their design, but generally were well described in regard to their development process. Listing the pros and cons of a decision was the most common method used. The 13 trials that compared decision support with or without VCMs reached mixed results: some found that VCMs improved some decision-making processes, while others found no effect.;Publisher version;NMAHP Research
URI: http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/12716/1/IPDAS-Chapter-D.pdf
https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/12716
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/12716
Standard no: http://ipdas.ohri.ca/resources.html
Type Of Material: Book Chapter
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport

Files in This Item:
Click on the URI links for accessing contents.


Items in HannanDL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.